Friday, March 23, 2007
Well...
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Conspiracy theory – India vs Bangladesh
Right after we lost to the young Bangladeshi side in the Group B match of the world cup, I saw this post on DP linking to various people ranting and raving about the dismal performance of Team
Monday, March 12, 2007
Back Home
I am back home after a week long trip to the west. The official purpose was to attend the big meeting of the American Physical Society and present my current research in the form of three talks. The unofficial purpose was to network with the prominent people of the community and catch up with old friends. All of this happened with gusto. The
Sunday, March 4, 2007
Rubbing me the wrong way
Blogged as part of the BLANK NOISE PROJECT BLOGATHON-2007.
I grew up in the big and crowded city of
Friday, March 2, 2007
Walking in winter
As the title suggests, this post is about my experiences with walking in winter in upstate
Then came the winter storm a few weeks back. We got 30 inches of snow in a span of 2 days. When I walked into work through this, I realized through first hand experience the hazards of walking through waist deep snow. If you lose your balance and fall (as you are bound to do) you actually go under the snow and getting back up is not easy at all as you have no surface that can lend any support! By this time I thought I had seen it all with respect to “winter walking hazards”. But then, this morning I walked in “freezing rain”, a meteorological phenomena that I don’t quite understand (something about not enough time between nucleation and precipitation for snow flakes to form). And do you know what freezing rain does to snow on the ground? It forms a layer of ice on top of it. So with every step one of two things will happen, either the ice will make you skid or the ice will give under your weight and you will find your leg disappearing into the snow and you have to use your other leg (which is hopefully free and clear) to extricate yourself from this hole! Is there more in store for me? I hope not! Oh Spring! When are you getting here?
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Blogathon against Eve teasing

The people over at Blank Noise Project have announced this year's Blogathon about fighting back against eve teasing. I have had several nasty experiences myself. So I will share one, so I can be part of this online campaign against this disgusting reality in the urban streets of India. More on March 7th.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Science and Honesty
Recently, Sunil over at Balancing life had this nice post where he was listing the qualities that distinguished a mediocre scientist from a truly good one. And to that post I added the following comment.
“I would like to add one more to your excellent list. Honesty. What I mean by that is to be able to see things as they are, not as we want them to be. Some of the really great ideas have come out because the scientist in question was really looking and was not trying to fit what he/she saw to the existing world view, but rather was willing to see that it was the world view that needed to be modified. It takes exceptional intellectual honesty to do this, especially in physics.”
But I don’t think I made myself very clear on what I actually meant. So, I thought I will take a moment to clarify in the unlikely event that a random reader of that post stumbled over here.
Now, what has all this go to do with science? A reductionist definition of fundamental science would be expressing observed phenomena in the language of mathematics. In this sense, nature is talking to the scientist and the scientist tries to understand what nature is telling him/her. And the scientist truly hears only when he/she eliminates the process of projection as described earlier in the context of normal language as applicable here to the language of mathematics. This is the quality I call intellectual honesty. It is the ability to see the box in the clichéd phrase of “thinking outside the box”. The example that comes to mind for me is the Maxwell Equations for the theory of electricity and magnetism. Once the wave equation was written down and found not to obey Galilean Invariance, the box forced people to come up with the Ether idea and spend time and energy looking for it. It was the people who saw the box that recognized that nature was telling us that she did not have Galilean Invariance, she had Lorentz Invariance. Sorry for the esoteric example to the non-physics folks and ask me to clarify if what I am saying rings a bell but does not quite hang together.